Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Naqsh-i Jahan Square, Isfahan at blue hour (2019, edited).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Panorama of Naqsh-i Jahan Square, Isfahan at blue hour (2019, edited).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2023 at 21:54:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
- Info created by Zahra gharaati - uploaded by Zahra gharaati - nominated by Sebring12Hrs -- Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Image needs a meaningful title per Commons:Image guidelines#Image page requirements. BigDom (talk) 08:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Done Good hint. I have renamed the file, added the missing {{Panorama}} template, renamed the nomination page and updated the links. Hope it’s good to go now. --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment An impressive panorama of the famous Naqsh-i Jahan Square, Isfahan at blue hour. Technically not perfect, but really good. I see one irritating stitching error at the left (see image note) and some minor CAs. Maybe we can repair this. Does anybody see other important stitching errors etc.? (Let’s collect them first before trying to fix them.) --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment It's a shame, you are right. But I'm not able to do that. Thanks for your others improvements. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Well, I can try it. I just want to know first if someone else spots (1.) similar issues (then we can try to fix them all at once) or (2.) some more severe issues which are not fixable (then it would not be worth the effort to fix that stitching error and the CAs). --Aristeas (talk) 12:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment It's all mostly just CA around most of the top level, apart from that I would vote support. 多多123 16:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment OK: here is an edited version with a fix for the stitching error and less CAs. If you like it, should we switch the nomination to that edited version? (It can be edited further, if necessary.) Please note that it is difficult/impossible to remove the CAs completely because this is a very colourful photo and the colour of the illumination varies much. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 19:12, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sebring12Hrs, Aristeas' version is a big improvement, are you planning to use it for the current nomination? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but I don't have the time to do the edit on te nomination. Feel free do to it yourself. Have a nice day. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- I hope you can find the time to edit the nomination, which will surely be a fraction of what it took Aristeas to manually correct the stitching error and chromatic aberration. In the meantime, I
Oppose--Julesvernex2 (talk) 20:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Removed previous oppose, thank you Radomianin for switching the nomination to Aristeas' version! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- I hope you can find the time to edit the nomination, which will surely be a fraction of what it took Aristeas to manually correct the stitching error and chromatic aberration. In the meantime, I
- Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 19:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support — (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 20:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 20:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Not the typical scene of Iran you'd expect. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support With a big thank to Aristeas for the improvements --Kritzolina (talk) 09:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support This is a really nice shot. Well composed. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:55, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 06:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm surprised that nobody complains about the bending caused by the panorama projection. No problem for me. Oppose But no FP, if the mentioned stitching error is remaining. --Milseburg (talk) 13:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The stitching issue is pretty obvious, and the right side is leaning out. We shouldn't give this image the star under these circumstances Poco a poco (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you, Poco a poco, for the hint about the right side leaning out! I have straightened the verticals at the right in the newest version of the retouched variant. --Aristeas (talk) 14:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Oppose for now. --Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination re-directed @Zahra gharaati, Sebring12Hrs, BigDom, 多多123, Julesvernex2, Hamid Hassani, Anna.Massini, SHB2000, Kritzolina, TheSandDoctor, Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης, MZaplotnik, Milseburg, and Poco a poco: I took the liberty to switch this nomination to the edited version by Aristeas. The nomination page has been renamed, I hope this is in the sense of all reviewers. Sorry for the mass ping ;) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- ok, I confirm my favorable vote. It's a beautiful photo. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 10:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Confirming my vote as well. TheSandDoctor (talk) 15:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- ok, I confirm my favorable vote. It's a beautiful photo. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 10:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination re-directed @Zahra gharaati, Sebring12Hrs, BigDom, 多多123, Julesvernex2, Hamid Hassani, Anna.Massini, SHB2000, Kritzolina, TheSandDoctor, Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης, MZaplotnik, Milseburg, and Poco a poco: I took the liberty to switch this nomination to the edited version by Aristeas. The nomination page has been renamed, I hope this is in the sense of all reviewers. Sorry for the mass ping ;) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support for the derived version. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support ditto. Thanks to Radomianin for updating the nomination! But I have learned that editing photos nominated by other users is not seen as helpful here, but as kind of an offence. So I am sorry for disturbing the nomination. I will stop offering edited versions for photos nominated by other users. --Aristeas (talk) 15:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much for your constructive and precious help with this nomination, Aristeas. In my opinion, it is an enrichment to rescue a nomination by making an edit. Using own skills for this serves the higher goal of making the FP media library more diverse and thus more valuable. Your abilities are an enhancement to us reviewers and later re-users of promoted files. This just as my unbiased two cents. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you. :–) --Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Too bad about the scaffolding, but beautiful, and I hope to visit Isfahan some fine day. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran