Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Auxerre.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Panorama of Auxerre.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2017 at 20:41:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info All by LivioAndronico (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Support -- LivioAndronico (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)- Support lNeverCry 21:10, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- Moderate support Not technically perfect, but nicely composed all the same. Daniel Case (talk) 00:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Lovely scene. It's only a moderately sharp 17 MP image when we frequently see more than that here, but great wow factor. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- I suggest crop per note. --Mile (talk) 07:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Your note hasn't shown up yet. Daniel Case (talk) 07:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support I'd also suggest a tighter crop (see my note - I couldn't find Miles' yet) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hope now is there. --Mile (talk) 07:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment - My problem with the photo as is is that I don't really like the right crop, which cuts through a boat (and also what seems to me to be a concession stand, but I care less about that). However, I'm not sure if either of the two suggested crops solve the problem for me. My main hesitation in terms of Martin's crop is that although it's neat, cropping out the tall tree might have an adverse effect on the form, making it unbalanced between right and left, plus I'd just miss seeing that tree and its reflection. Something similar to Mile's crop might be helpful, but I wouldn't suggest bisecting the reflection of the trees near the near right corner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Weak oppose Whilst this is well-processed and it's a lovely image, the right crop is too bad and I don't think this can be rescued in post. This kind of thing needs to be thought about in the field, unfortunately. Turning the camera a little to the right would have saved this. The reflections and processing are definitely impressive though. I hope my review is helpful. -- Thennicke (talk) 10:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)- Oppose The composition does not work for me, too much foreground water, sorry. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Done thanks --LivioAndronico (talk) 23:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support now. Jee 03:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - Gut feeling: Even with this crop, this is a good to very good picture but not one of the most outstanding on this site. No offense intended. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Neutral An attractive picture (I love the autumn colours of the trees on the right), but it's a bit unbalanced with the left side "higher" than the right. I also find the NR (?) smears too many details away. - Benh (talk) 15:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 22:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
