Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Agüimes, May 2018.jpg

File:Panorama of Agüimes, May 2018.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2018 at 20:25:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Agüimes, May 2018.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Agüimes, May 2018.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
•  Info Panorama of Agüimes, Gran Canaria, offering an impression of traditional Canarian architecture. All by me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow for me; it's seems a fairly uninteresting town in fairly ordinary light conditions.--Peulle (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I agree. It's a pretty view, but the crops on the left and right feel arbitrary to me and the sky could use some clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment interesting, I really did expect the image to face a friendlier welcome here. I really like this picture for several reasons: There are several parallel horizontal "layers"; the image is arranged (roughly) according to the rule of thirds, the town's generally rather picturesque to me; weather and lighting are finally as one might hope for - in fact I visited this spot on different days (and passed it on even more occasions) because the weather was rather dull most of the time. But well, sometimes it's spinning the roulette wheel... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Info ok, I've redeveloped the raw to make the image a bit more vibrant (and to make the nom look more like the situation actually was. I may have been too cautious first), pinging Peulle, Ikan Kekek. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:49, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - Much nicer but while good, still not an outstanding composition to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Really, this unusual presentation wows me more than your other current mainstreamlike nomination that seems somewhat sterile to me. --Milseburg (talk) 17:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Moderate support I wish the background could have been a bit sharper, but this works for me. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination ok, it was worth a shot... double meaning intended ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:10, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 18:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)