Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorámica esférica del Seminario de Nobles, Calatayud, España, 2014-12-29, DD 01-105 HDR PAN.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Panorámica esférica del Seminario de Nobles, Calatayud, España, 2014-12-29, DD 01-105 HDR PAN.JPG, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2019 at 17:09:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
- Info Spherical panorama of the courtyard of the former Real Seminario de Nobles in Calatayud, Spain. The Seminario de Nobles used to be an education institution just before college for nobel and bourgeois people. There are only 6 of its kind in the world and this one dates from mid of the 18th century. All by me, Poco2 17:09, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Info To view this file in a proper browser for this kind of perspective, please, click here. Poco2 17:09, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco2 17:09, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support WOW -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 18:07, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I get significant JPG compression artifacts in the interactive viewer and I'm not sure how to vote as this is very detrimental to the whole experience but not a fault of your image file. – Lucas 18:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Agreed, Lucas, it's a shame the interactive viewer does that. But the artifacts aren't on the picture itself, and it would IMO be unfair to punish Poco for the deficiencies of the Commons PanoViewer. Excellent picture, just as good as your last spherical pano. Cmao20 (talk) 19:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support It would have been better without the shadow on the structure (maybe taking the picture at noon) --Wilfredor (talk) 20:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Wilfredor: getting the keys to that place was already a nightmare...I've reduced the highlights so that the difference between those areas is not too much Poco2 19:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Nice. If I was you, I'd cloned myself out from the reflection on the glass door. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- I did so in the last version, Podzemnik Poco2 19:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Strong WOW! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:45, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --BoothSift 03:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 03:54, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Question, though: Is the noise in the sky in the photo or a result of the pano viewer? If it's in the photo, see if you can improve it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:48, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Lucas, Cmao20, Ikan Kekek, I've reduced the noise in the sky, hopefully the panoviewer is smoother now... Poco2 19:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Oppose for now, I see stitching errors, see note--Uoaei1 (talk) 10:24, 28 April 2019 (UTC)- Uoaei1: gone along with a reduction of highlights --Poco2 14:31, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:34, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Uoaei1: gone along with a reduction of highlights --Poco2 14:31, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:22, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I had to let this sit with me for a while, but ultimately I find the courtyard too boring and uniform, nothing interesting to see for me. On the technical side, I think there are some processing errors on the parts of the facade in light: some areas are covered with a greyish surface (just as if it was clipping and brightness was reduced afterwards), which ends very abruptly all around. It doesn't look like something natural. Even without that some parts are overexposed beyond recovery. – Lucas 10:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose for the part which was overexposed and then brought back, not entirely successfully. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:03, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I'm traveling right now but tonight will look into the brigther area and either address your comments or revert that change Poco2 11:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- KoH, Lucas, I went one step back with the rework of the brighter area, FYI too, Wilfredor Poco2 19:51, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Still overexposed brickwork, sadly. – Lucas 19:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- KoH, Lucas, I went one step back with the rework of the brighter area, FYI too, Wilfredor Poco2 19:51, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support I'm a big fan of panoramics and I know that getting them right can be quite difficult. This one is just great. MartinD (talk) 08:55, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors