Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paeonia rockii 2015 G1.jpg

File:Paeonia rockii 2015 G1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 17:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Paeonia rockii 2015 G1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paeonia rockii 2015 G1.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info created, uploaded by George Chernilevsky - nominated by --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Info Rock's tree peony (Paeonia rockii)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice flower. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--LivioAndronico talk 18:32, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 20:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 20:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just a QI for me. I feel like you can find better specimens of this flower; this one is rather asymmetric, with the bottom folded up a little. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm afraid I have to agree with KoH's opinion this time.--Jebulon (talk) 21:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment It is the flower revealing from a bud. The middle is still hidden partially by petals. The nature lives not according to a drawings for the sake of symmetry. I wanted to show freshness and awakening of this flower. This plant blossoms only few days, so new photos will be at next year. Anyway, thanks for the review. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Good quality but no wow and busy background, many flowers show the best timing a few days in a year thus that is not the featured factor, imho. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others, no wow. --LB 16:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose no wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically well done and probably a good candidate for VI as well, but it doesn't really stand out against all the other high-quality close-ups of flowers we have. --El Grafo (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)