Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oye stave church.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Oye stave church.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2016 at 16:24:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
Info The Øye stave church in Øye, Vang, Norway. A small but beautiful and very charming stave church. Picture taken in a sunny day, as opposed to the rest of the pictures in the category which were taken under a cloudy sky. Created by ElBute - uploaded by ElBute - nominated by ElBute -- ElBute (talk) 16:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Support -- ElBute (talk) 16:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)- Support I like this one, quality is good. --Mile (talk) 19:45, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 01:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support - This is beautiful and very restful to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Very good. --Code (talk) 04:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Regretful
Oppose Beautiful image, but such large blown areas in the clouds are a no-go for me here, even more so in an HDR. Compo a bit too centered for me, I’d prefer to pan the camera slightly to the right. Would have prevented the cow on the left from being beheaded, too. --Kreuzschnabel 04:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment It's not an HDR. I'm aware it seems as if it is, but it's not. I share your preferences towards non centered photos, but I like this one centered. The cow will be cloned out this evening. --ElBute (talk) 06:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --The Photographer (talk) 12:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The beheaded cow has been cloned out. Highlights in the clouds have also been reduced. --ElBute (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- ElBute was there someone sitting on left bench before ? --Mile (talk) 18:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not exactly. It was a flare I had to remove. --ElBute (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good composition. I think the dark areas were brightened. So there is (minor) noise. --XRay talk 05:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Neutral I like it a lot, but, in this case, the good things about it cannot overcome the blown highlights in the clouds noted by Kreuzschnabel. If they could be cleaned up or toned down I'd probably support. Daniel Case (talk) 05:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Highlights were reduced in the second upload on 20th May. Anyway, they were not blown up in the first version of the image (the histogram said) and they're not in this second version. I don't think it's a flaw in the image but a distinguishing feature. --ElBute (talk) 07:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Pugilist (talk),
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
