Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orgel der Schlosskirche.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Orgel der Schlosskirche.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2021 at 19:16:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Salvador Escriva - uploaded by Salvador Escriva - nominated by Salvador Escriva -- Salvador Escriva (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Support -- Salvador Escriva (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Beautiful motif but not sharp enough for QI/FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Ikan Kekek, unfortunately I have this problem with the a-290, I just can't get the perfect sharpness. Maybe it's because of the edition, I don't know, I'm still new to this. It would be interesting editing it less or it doesn't make sense. Otherwise, I will have to wait until I can change photographic equipment to nominate photos. Thanks for the comment - Salvador Escriva (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment I definitely understand. FPC is very demanding because we're looking for the best of the best here, so people who have great equipment definitely have a somewhat easier time producing FPs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment You don't need to change equipment, just your technique. Chromatic aberration (lightroom) and noise (Topaz denoise) can be corrected. Additionally you could have used a panorama to get better quality photos. Obviously good equipment and money to travel and take photos of majestic buildings increases the chances of getting outstanding images. However, this is not a competition, but rather a family, a support group to improve each other. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Wilfredor, I am aware of both the equipment limitation and my limitation as a photographer. It is one of the reasons why I dare to publish, to learn. I appreciate all criticism in advance and I hope to learn from it. This photograph is edited, so I ask now, maybe I passed the edit? And thanks for the comment - Salvador Escriva (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment oh, and thanks for the comments and for not having crushed me from the beginning, I hope I can learn it quickly and be able to collaborate with some of my photographs - Salvador Escriva (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment FPC is a tough place to do that. Don't get me wrong; I don't discourage you from continuing to post your best work here, but you may get more out of posting to COM:Photography critiques, COM:Photo challenge (where relevant) and/or COM:QIC first. Photo challenge works differently from the others, though; sometimes, the highest-quality photos don't finish in the top 3 there and some striking but small and fairly low-quality work does. But it can still be fun. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose, very noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
