Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oil shale - from research to reality 03. Enefit280 plant, view of the plant.jpg

File:Oil shale - from research to reality 03. Enefit280 plant, view of the plant.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2022 at 10:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Oil shale - from research to reality 03. Enefit280 plant, view of the plant.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oil shale - from research to reality 03. Enefit280 plant, view of the plant.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry
•  Info created and uploaded by User:Veerdelauri - nominated by Benh (talk) 10:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I think all of these 360° deserve nom. Let me use my quota to help. -- Benh (talk) 10:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Same remarks as for the other oil shale nom. I think in a few decades, when this industry no longer exists, these will be great historical documents. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 06:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose The garbage disposal candidate really wowed me for being so much more than a 360° view of a place I'll never be able to visit. Compared to that, this one feels more like a VI candidate to me. --El Grafo (talk) 07:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

  while the Wall-E candidate is incredible, I'm finding opposing that one a bit extreme. The execution is like flawless, and the composition is also pretty good with all the shadow patterns, how the sun was handled. One can easily tell this was carefully planned, shot and processed. Not sure we can say the same of some other FP here. And VI sounds more like "unique, but crappy pics" to me, which clearly isn't the case here. - Benh (talk) 08:04, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Side point, but I have to object to your take on VIs. They are best in scope, which can often mean an FP, if there is one. In fact, I'd urge more people to nominate FPs when they are also the most useful images in a given scope at thumbnail size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support One of the first of these panoramas I've seen here where more than one view would by itself be a good FP candidate. Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Benh, we don't have many 360° images on FP. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 17:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Estonia