Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:October Bout-20121027-870.jpg

File:October Bout-20121027-870.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2018 at 08:09:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:October Bout-20121027-870.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:October Bout-20121027-870.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
•  Info created by David Bedard - uploaded by Palosirkka - nominated by Palosirkka -- Palosirkka (talk) 08:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Palosirkka (talk) 08:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Imported from Flickr? Was this made by a Wikipedian? And apart from that even to me as a sports photographer this is too dark, too noisy (there's even chrominance noise visible) and the amount of action that roller derby could show not enough. --Granada (talk)

 Comment It doesn't have to be made by a Commoner to reach FP status, that's QI you're talking about. :) That said, I  Oppose because the quality is far below FP level.--Peulle (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Exactly, but I don't think it's good enough to pass at QIC even if it were a photo by a Commoner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment @Peulle: Then I'm sorry and was wrong. I thought I once saw an instant rejection of an FPC as it was not made by a Wikipedian/Commoner. --Granada (talk) 10:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Very low quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Without even looking at it at full size, I'm unimpressed. It doesn't convey any sense of a fast-paced and violent sport. Daniel Case (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow. --Gnosis (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose While being a not so stunning shot, the technical realisation not good enough for a FP either. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is of too low quality to be featured.--Peulle (talk) 23:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 11:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)