Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Norderney, Kurplatz, Fahrradständer -- 2018 -- 1023.jpg

File:Norderney, Kurplatz, Fahrradständer -- 2018 -- 1023.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2018 at 18:10:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Norderney, Kurplatz, Fahrradständer -- 2018 -- 1023.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Norderney, Kurplatz, Fahrradständer -- 2018 -- 1023.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others_2
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 18:10, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 18:10, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose this blurred board on the left with unreadable text -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

• It is not necessary to have the whole photograph sharp. A sharp board would be disturbing. The composition is to have only the first rack sharp. --XRay ^talk 04:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

• More precisely, this blurred board with unreadable text spoils the composition. Eye-catching, this element occupies the main place on the left side of the image, and thus seems to be intentionally there, whereas it's just nothing. Not interesting, not legible, not in focus. Just disturbing, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose I could see how this might have seemed like it could work, but the background is too distracting. If a way could be found to make it work as just the bike rack, perhaps there is an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now per others. Please crop out the sign. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

I think about an alternative in square or 4:5 aspect ratio without the sign, but I trouble to do this within the next days. I'm looking for a solution. --XRay ^talk 07:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose I quite like the idea, but I would have stepped to the right and focused on the metal hoops, making that perspective the main thing.--Peulle (talk) 13:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Support The alternative without the sign! --XRay ^talk 07:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
• @Basotxerri, Basile Morin, Daniel Case, and Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your reviews. Here is a cropped version without the sign. --XRay ^talk 07:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - It's better, IMO, but I'd like it more if you also cropped out the rest of the window - in other words, a relatively tight crop of the pole just to the right of the window. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose It would make a nice Photo Challenge entry, but there are too many distracting elements for the geometric repeat to be appreciated. Also you are perhaps not at enough of an angle to appreciate the repeat. -- Colin (talk) 12:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Better. And I still like it. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

---

•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews. I think the image isn't good enough for FP. --XRay ^talk 05:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 22:28, 22 February 2018 (UTC)