Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nokia Networks Munich Office, April 2017.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Nokia Networks Munich Office, April 2017.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2017 at 08:40:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
- Info Nokia Networks, Munich office: Worm's-eye view with contrails; all by me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support WOW!! This should be bought by Nokia and used in their ads. I like the not-perfectly-aligned way you have shot this, it gives you a sense of movement sort of like looking at Earth from a slowly rotating space station with lots of shiny monoliths heading for it. There is some color noise at the edges, but I'm sure you will take care of that. ;) --cart-Talk 10:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Interestellar movie station --The Photographer 12:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good view. --Mile (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Support- Very good, though I think I'd prefer it without the plane and contrail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)SupportI agree with Ikan about the plane and contrail. This would be just about perfect without that. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment a matter of taste maybe. Imo the plane adds another interesting element... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose On 2nd thought, I can't support with the disharmonious contrail. Daphne Lantier 21:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Another FP in the category of "images that would make me think the band that would use this on their album cover made music I might find interesting and thus buy the album without knowing what it sounds like, especially if the back cover showed a couple of guys with European names standing behind their synthesizers" or "images that would make me pick the book up and thumb through it."
Yes, I like the idea of it without the contrail, and we could certainly make a cloned-out version, but that's not enough to offset all the other things about this one. Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Very mild Oppose, only because I favor the contrailless version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support The contrail is a plus. --Yann (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 09:19, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Alternative sans contrail[edit]
- Info Ok guys, pinging cart, The Photographer, Mile, Ikan Kekek, Daphne Lantier, Daniel Case, an alternative without plane and contrail, taken half a minute later. Cloning by nature if you will.
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I do prefer this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this one. The contrail is a bit distracting in the other one, even though it is sharply captured with the plane -- the eye is drawn to the plane, rather than the building or the geometric forms. Also with this one the cloud pattern is better, looking almost like a globe with cloudy continents drifting on it. -- Colin (talk) 07:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Either one deserves to be featured, but I still like the plane. --cart-Talk 08:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Strong support per my !vote above. Daniel Case (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Perfect! Daphne Lantier 18:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 09:19, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Thennicke (talk) 12:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Code (talk) 05:52, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Jee 13:00, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Germany
The chosen alternative is: File:Nokia Networks Munich Office, April 2017 -02.jpg