Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 foto2 2016-08-24 20.20.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 foto2 2016-08-24 20.20.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2017 at 15:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands
Info In the foreground you see recently build extra protection in case of a river flood, the monumental bridge is just in the background.- Info created by Michielverbeek - uploaded by Michielverbeek - nominated by Michielverbeek --Michielverbeek (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Michielverbeek (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)- Support -- PumpkinSky talk 17:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Curves and lines going everywhere; from the stairs down and curving to the left ... over the bridge, another bridge... Neat. :) --Peulle (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Nice light on the bridge but too much of the photo is unlit. And the couple in the centre of the photo catch they eye but are dark. -- Colin (talk) 21:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)- Oppose I find the crop on the right too tight, and the stairs in the foreground too distracting --Uoaei1 (talk) 22:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Foreground is too dark, lots of uninteresting sky at the top. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, but I have to agree with the other opposers --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose, the foreground takes away too much from the bridges, which also suffer from this angle. Daniel Case (talk) 01:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 16:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
