Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) 24-11-2020. (actm.) 01.jpg

File:Nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) 24-11-2020. (actm.) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2022 at 07:23:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) 24-11-2020. (actm.) 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) 24-11-2020. (actm.) 01.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Tricholomataceae
•  Info (Clitocybe nebularis) clouded agaric Focus stack of 25 photos.}}
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support On closer inspection, the flies make it interesting. You can also buy the image here . I found almost all my FPs there. Each of you should have a look there. Unfortunately, this happens again and again.--Ermell (talk) 08:41, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

• Note: Thanks for your tip. This is new to me. I'll try to get the picture out of there. My knowledge of the English language is zero. So it will probably be difficult.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
• I would suggest that everyone that finds their images illegally used by Shutterstock does two things: i) send them a DMCA take down notice (instructions on how to do so here; ii) expose the situation to specialised media (e.g. [1],[2],[3]). Past experience suggests that it is only when these guys get involved (e.g. [4]) that Shutterstock stops dragging their feet and does something about this growing issue -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you also for the addresses.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

• No worries. Let me know if I can help with the language barrier, happy to do so -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks for the offer. I appreciate that a lot.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:52, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 09:47, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment there is a trace of green hot pixels on the photo (note added). --Ivar (talk) 10:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

•  Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

•  Support --Ivar (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

•  Support --IamMM (talk) 11:26, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Striking macro --Tagooty (talk) 15:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Sajbadina (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Magogre (talk) 04:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Qualified support per the slight halo and background noise in some areas. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Dinkum (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:46, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Tricholomataceae