Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neuhaus Mühlweiher 17RM2099.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Neuhaus Mühlweiher 17RM2099.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2017 at 07:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info all by me Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 07:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 07:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)- Support - This is gorgeous, immediately struck me at thumbnail size and doesn't disappoint me at larger sizes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Staggering. Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Oppose It's nice, but for me the wow is spoiled by those branches poking in from various directions.--Peulle (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support Lovely. Those branches give depth and dimension. PumpkinSky talk
- Oppose Casual topic and "zero wow effect". Very annoying branch on the upper left corner. - Benh (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support and wow! --Milseburg (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support and 7....For above! --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry, but neither the light nor the composition is featured for me. --Ivar (talk) 10:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Very weak oppose So much went right with this picture, but I've looked at an inordinate amount of water-reflection pictures while creating and diffusing that category and this one just doesn't stand out enough for me. Maybe a zoomed shot of the mill opposite? As it is it just doesn't seem to have a subject, pretty through the background and foreground are. Daniel Case (talk) 16:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per opposers.--Jebulon (talk) 09:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /M★Zaplotnik (edits) 14:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
