Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Natural History Museum UK.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Natural History Museum UK.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2013 at 00:46:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Chiugoran - uploaded by Chiugoran - nominated by Mono -- —Mono 00:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Support -- —Mono 00:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)- Support Blurred Lines 04:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Great! --Kikos (talk) 11:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful! Very good composition.--XRay talk 11:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Very nice lighting but very disturbing person in the foreground taking a picture (which guides me to believe this is a snapshot) and (apart from the perspective distortion, that would be acceptable IMO) the picture is tilted ccw. Without a tilt and without people in the foreground this would be a great FP Poco2 14:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)- Oppose What a wonderful picture! But why these distored people in the forground? They destroy imho the photo and are not well integrated into the composition. Have you probably a photo without people (in the foreground)? If there had been fewer childeren and a bit more upstairs the blue of their clothes would match the blue of the window and would be great. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:13, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco² and Tuxyso.M49314 (talk) 17:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support I actually like the kids running up the stairs. In my opinion, it stresses the perspective and the composition. Perhaps it would have been better without the person with the camera, but still a good composition in my opinion.--ArildV (talk) 10:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose No problem with the people here; but this distorted view gives me no idea about its shape. Moreover, the camera seems shifted upward. JKadavoor Jee 07:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support The children are an integral part of the image and give great liveliness to the composition. Remember that FPC is not all about encyclopedic value, and we welcome exceptional freely-licensed images over a much wider remit. This photo recently won the special jury prize for the Best Architectural/Documentary image in WLM UK 2013 (a template to that effect has not yet been added to the image page). --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support per Michael. It has flaws, but it has an energy that few architectural photos have. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 20:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco --Vamps (talk) 18:25, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco and Tuxyso. The girl at the right side and the boy with the red rucksack are very disturbing (I find the other nice, as Julian and Arild say). --Kadellar (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kadellar, the idea is interesting. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Weak Support as for ArildV. I'd suggest cropping to better symmetry (e.g. Windows left and right are differently cut). Those kids inclusive camera and daypack are the wow factor! -- Smial (talk) 11:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Selbymay (talk) 16:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose people cut very badly (it seems that the photographer ignore)--Pava (talk) 20:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
