Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NSU 251 OSL, Bj. 1941 (2012-06-10 Sp).JPG

File:NSU 251 OSL, Bj. 1941 (2012-06-10 Sp).JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2014 at 12:57:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:NSU 251 OSL, Bj. 1941 (2012-06-10 Sp).JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NSU 251 OSL, Bj. 1941 (2012-06-10 Sp).JPG

2793

8

100

67

3763

2508

cut-off part of bike

•  Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Spurzem -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:57, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:57, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kikos (talk) 16:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Crops a little tight but not to the extent that it ruins the picture. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 19:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  OpposeThat's a nice bike! But what's special about the photo?

Daniel Case: please, don't take this as an offense but as a genuine question regarding the consistency in your critiques. How come don't you like a tight crop when it makes sense to emphasize the fact that a car is being parked in a tight space, but that the unnecessary tight crop in this photo doesn't bother you? I'd be curious to understand your point of view. -- Christopher Crouzet (talk) 03:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

OK, good question. In this case, despite the crop, I can tell what's around the vehicle. In the case of the Chevy, it was an informed attribute—you can't tell from the picture that it's in a tight space. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks for the explanation! My turn, I guess—this picture brings me a discomfort because it's lacking space to "breathe" whereas this same discomfort in the Chevrolet's photo is a wanted "feature" to add to the context. I thought the tight space was obvious enough from the walls on each side but I understand if it isn't. (Sorry for the slightly out of topic) -- Christopher Crouzet (talk) 03:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Here you see the bear and the pennant

•  Oppose Crop is way too tight, and there’s a part of the bike cut off (emerging behind the mirror). Blown reflections. Not a bad pic but below FP threshold for me. --Kreuzschnabel 04:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment. OK. I see once more that it is useless for me to present a photo here. For explanation: The „part of the bike“ behind the mirror is a little bear. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 06:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I was speaking about the pole above the bear. Regarding your first point: Nominating an image here is a request for discussion, it’s like asking "tell me what you think of it". And that’s what we did. Nobody was insulting you, nobody asked you to go away. Why such a perfectly matter-of-fact discussion is "useless" for you is beyond my understanding. --Kreuzschnabel 08:47, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

This pole is a flagg-staff at which the bear and a pennant are fastened. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose It is a nice bike, but the crop is too tight, and I find the background is distracting, sorry. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 04:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)