Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NJ-139 and I-78 Jersey City November 2021 002.jpg

File:NJ-139 and I-78 Jersey City November 2021 002.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2022 at 07:13:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:NJ-139 and I-78 Jersey City November 2021 002.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NJ-139 and I-78 Jersey City November 2021 002.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States
•  Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:13, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:13, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Really interesting idea that works. Great use of morning light to capture the inbound commute; I love the contrast between near bumper-to-bumper on the tunnel approach with that one car going WB. Great quality for a drone ... the Midtown skyline looks a little artificial, as does Newport to its right, but they're shrouded in haze so that explains it somewhat. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support Good quality aerial photo with a nice composition but the hazy light does lack 'wow' a little for me. Cmao20 (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Maybe I'm being too tough, but I'd like to see this motif photographed on a non-hazy day or perhaps closer to sunrise or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I've liked some of your urban drone compositions, but the motif here just doesn't stand out for me, sorry to say. It does feel like a morning commute, but while that makes for a good documentary photo, I don't get "wow" from it. Perhaps I am biased from having been part of those commutes at times in my life. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:53, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose pek Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 10:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do agree with Ikan Kerek, the subject/compo is interesting but needs a better lighting to make it extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Looking for a while at it it has grown for me. --Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)