Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo Estatal de Historia, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 49.jpg

File:Museo Estatal de Historia, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 49.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2019 at 16:09:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Museo Estatal de Historia, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 49.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo Estatal de Historia, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 49.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info Looks per the discussion below that this picture might have a better chance of reaching FP. Personally I think it's better composed and shot under nicer light. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Info Building of the State Historical Museum view from the Red Square, Moscow, Russia. The host of the Russian history museum was built based on Sherwood's neo-Russian design between 1875 and 1881. Poco² 17:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:57, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- EATCHA (talk) 17:06, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Just introduced some improvements, thank you for the nom, Cmao20! --Poco² 17:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Milan Bališin (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support very good. Charles (talk) 22:06, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:58, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support – Lucas 09:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I have this strange feeling that the image is tilted slightly CCW, or that it's off centre. I can't shake that feeling.--Peulle (talk) 11:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

• I made some slight changes Peulle, hopefully you can now shake tht feeling --Poco² 12:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Yes. I also suspect that the building itself isn't entirely straight everywhere. :) --Peulle (talk) 14:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
• Poco a poco, I find that the most recent change is too radical in changing the height/width aspect ratio of the building. In reality there is only one aspect ratio, but you changed it in your photo so I can't be sure anymore which is closer to reality. – Lucas 17:37, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

• Lucas, I didn't change the aspect ratio in the last edit but in the one just after Cmao20 launched this nom, so before your review. Maybe you already reviewed the image before, and the previous version was in the cache of your computer. An aspect ratio change was required, I looked it at it in detail taking the circles in the windows as reference and went a step back in that edit. Please, have a look at it. --Poco² 17:56, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks! – Lucas 18:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --BoothSift 21:00, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Pile-on support Remembering Daniel Case. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 21:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support good quality. Charles (talk) 22:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 03:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture