Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Mangfallplatz.JPG

File:Munich subway station Mangfallplatz.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2014 at 13:02:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Mangfallplatz.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Mangfallplatz.JPG

•  Info Munich subway station Mangfallplatz with train arriving - all by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice, although the signs and the clocks are a bit overexposed.--Florian Fuchs (talk) 14:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment that's true, Florian. Usually the lighting in underground stations is very demanding, often being too bright and too dark at the same time. The dynamic range in need is huge. So this image forms a compromise. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:35, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
    •  Comment That's why I supported it anyway. Although, you might have considered creating a DRI... --Florian Fuchs (talk) 16:55, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
      •  Comment Yes, in fact I had considered that option, but there were too many non-static elements, i.e. the train and the passengers. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:53, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
        •  Comment With a DRI you could have chosen certain parts from each picture. In that case e.g. the signs from a picture with a shorter exposure time and the remaining parts from the photo displayed here. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 17:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
          •  Comment Unfortunately I'm still not really familiar with exposure blending and HDR techniques - sounds like a good new year's resolution ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Funny, this is my subwaystation. I live 300m from there :-)   • Richard • [®] • 20:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --ArildV (talk) 11:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 11:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Araujojoan96 (talk) 14:40, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Per Florian Fuchs, but per the author answers too...--Jebulon (talk) 15:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry. The picture is a bit soft to me, and the design of this station doesn't generate much of wow (this one is way more interesting), although the long exposure of the train is of course a very nice idea. --A.Savin 18:40, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Whatever one thinks of the station's design, I like the composition it offered. I wish the lit signs at the far end of the platform weren't so blown, but given how far they are from the camera it's a miracle we can read anything at all down there. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support (weak   • Richard • [®] • 20:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Prefered the another FPC, this station is too ordinary to me and the perspective distortion is not helping, either Poco² 11:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Info there's no distortion, in fact the walls are slanting. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 16:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors