Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mumbai 03-2016 52 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mumbai 03-2016 52 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2016 at 22:15:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by A.Savin --A.Savin 22:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 22:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)- Strong support Great subject! I like social themes. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Great to see Mumbai represented here! -- Thennicke (talk) 01:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- ArionEstar its like seaside favela. Saturation could be decreased. --Mile (talk) 07:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support good work! --Hubertl 10:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 01:51, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Comment Am I the only one who thinks the composition would have been much better if the wall wasn't visible? Not sure if it was possible, but usually it helps to lean over the wall to avoid it being in the view IMO. Diliff (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- The reason was to have the apartment house at the right completely. Thanks --A.Savin 13:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- You wouldn't have had to sacrifice the apartment building on the right though, you just had to shift the camera's position to the left but maintain the same camera direction. This would move the wall out of view, but keep the same view in the background. In theory, anyway. As I said, I don't know if it was physically possible, but from what I can see in the view, it should be. Diliff (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- OK, I'm not sure anymore how it was exactly; I believe, however, the camera was shifted as far to the left as possible. Normally, I try the best to avoid any distracting elements. --A.Savin 14:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- You wouldn't have had to sacrifice the apartment building on the right though, you just had to shift the camera's position to the left but maintain the same camera direction. This would move the wall out of view, but keep the same view in the background. In theory, anyway. As I said, I don't know if it was physically possible, but from what I can see in the view, it should be. Diliff (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- The reason was to have the apartment house at the right completely. Thanks --A.Savin 13:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Strong support Beautiful and tragic at the same time ... this is a great documentary image that tells us so much. I have added it to Urbanization of India on enwiki. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
