Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mosquero Cardenal, Vermilion Flycatcher, Pyrocephalus rubinus (17352440678) (cropped).jpg

File:Mosquero Cardenal, Vermilion Flycatcher, Pyrocephalus rubinus (17352440678) (cropped).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2016 at 12:00:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mosquero Cardenal, Vermilion Flycatcher, Pyrocephalus rubinus (17352440678) (cropped).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mosquero Cardenal, Vermilion Flycatcher, Pyrocephalus rubinus (17352440678) (cropped).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
•  Info created by Amado Demesa - uploaded by Josve05a - nominated by Josve05a -- Josve05a (talk) 12:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Josve05a (talk) 12:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment This is a cropped version of Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mosquero Cardenal, Vermilion Flycatcher, Pyrocephalus rubinus (17352440678).jpg. Josve05a (talk) 12:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 12:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I actually think the photo should be cropped even more on the viewer's left, but I love the bird and this photo is good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - nicely done. Atsme 📞 16:45, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition is nice, but the lighting is bad. There is an overall unsharpness, the background is grainy, and the resolution is on the low side. -- Ram-Man 16:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ram-Man, sorry. Harsh light, and sharpness is insufficient for an FPC of just about 4.6 mpix. --Kreuzschnabel 21:26, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Although the composition is good and the harsh light could be ameliorated with careful processing, the overall unsharpness cannot be fixed. -- Rftblr (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. INeverCry 00:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Robert. Great colors and composition that suffer from unsharpness. Also blown areas on the wood beneath the bird. Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)