Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monumento al Campesino - César Manrique - San Bartolomé - 02.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Monumento al Campesino - César Manrique - San Bartolomé - 02.JPG, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2016 at 14:58:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)- Support I like the composition and the overall simplicity. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment Great motive, but the top of this construction is imho not sharp enough - probably you've focused on the lower part which was much closer to the camera. There is remarkable color noise / artefacts on the upper shadow parts. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info Colour noise reduced --Llez (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - Still a little glary and noisy, but the main thing is that I just don't love the composition. When I move my eyes around the picture frame, I feel like the monument somewhat sits there, with only a bit of movement higher up. I don't know if there could be a way to photograph just this monument that would satisfy me as a Featured Picture Candidate, but I like a picture like this or this better, although I wouldn't commit to voting for either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Info Completely new version uploaded --Llez (talk) 00:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Color noise removal was more or less successfull. But the latest version is overdone regarding noise reduction. I guess that the surface of the monument is somehow structured as can be seen on this photo. With the current strong NR the structure is nearly completely smoothed. The file current file size shows that remarkable information were lost. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info Sorry, the photo you refer to - like also this one or this one - were taken some years ago. You see, that the monument is very smudgy. Meanwhile the Monument is restored, as you can see in this actual photo. No more dirt, pure white, surface restored! In full resolution you can well see the actual surface structure. Please excuse me, that I made a photo in 2016 which not represents the state in 2010 or 2011! --Llez (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Frank -- Thennicke (talk) 08:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 00:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan. I prefer this composition. INeverCry 02:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Frank. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects
