Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mono Cliffs Provincial Park autumn panorama.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mono Cliffs Provincial Park autumn panorama.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2020 at 19:33:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario
Info: autumn colours at the Mono Cliffs Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)- Support Great colours/colors. Is that Toronto in the distance? Charles (talk) 19:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- It is, you are very observant! :-) --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Wow! That is some SERIOUSLY good image quality. I couldn't see Toronto at all without zooming in, but once I did, it was there clear as day! —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you! There was no haziness in the air that day. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:04, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Fischer.H (talk) 13:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful colours. Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Jetam2 (talk) 20:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but nothing special IMO. Just a huge photo of trees and the sky.--Claus 14:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)- Oppose Agree with Claus. What is the subject of the picture, and why a panorama? —kallerna (talk) 05:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The colours are really beautiful, but I think that the panorama is quite dark, especially the farther hills. — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Comment @Claus Obana, Kallerna, and Draceane: You are right: at first glance there doesn't seem to be much going for this photo, but the wow for me is that when I zoomed in, I could see lots of small details that weren't there at first. It's like a huge painting that looks like a mess of boringness from afar, but when you step close you can see all of the tiny details. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)- Support per Percival --Milseburg (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Claus. -- Karelj (talk) 18:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a distinctive composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Im am sorry but also per above, I also got this kind of feedback about some of my Alaska landscapes Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Nice picture, but not good enough for FP, sorry. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose After long thinking, per Tournasol7, sorry. --Cart (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
