Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Misvormde nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) in verval. Locatie De Famberhorst 04.JPG

File:Misvormde nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) in verval. Locatie De Famberhorst 04.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2016 at 21:07:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Misvormde nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) in verval. Locatie De Famberhorst 04.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Misvormde nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) in verval. Locatie De Famberhorst 04.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi
•  Info created and uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
• I'm willing to  Support this picture, but it should be noted that there's already a featured picture of a very similar view. It's hard to pick which one is better than the other, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: As for me, it is not very clear if you support or not this picture. You use the template {s}, but your comment makes me have a doubt. Could you please clarify ? Thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 23:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
    • Yes, I support the picture. I thought it was worth pointing out that another similar view had been featured, but I'm not troubled by featuring two good views. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
      • Thanks for answer ! --Jebulon (talk) 11:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is the same mushroom(s).--Jebulon (talk) 23:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jebulon. INeverCry 04:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Near identical of already FP. Yann (talk) 05:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)}}
•  Oppose Sorry, Famberhorst, but this picture is too close to the other one. --Hubertl 08:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, Dominicus, of course, Σπάρτακος was the nominator, not you! --Hubertl 17:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is a different version of existing FP, as noted above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Case solved. -- Pofka (talk) 17:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)