Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Metro de São Paulo, Brazil.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Metro de São Paulo, Brazil.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2018 at 15:50:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info All by -- The Photographer 15:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose because I wouldn't want to be caught like that in a subway and be exposed on a front page of a large traffic website ; and maybe those people don't want either. - Benh (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Only fyi the people on front is my family and friends. --The Photographer 18:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- OK thanks. But there are other people behind ;-) - Benh (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Only fyi the people on front is my family and friends. --The Photographer 18:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Good shot of a train interior, but now wow (sorry) --A.Savin 19:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per A.Savin.--Peulle (talk) 00:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support I like it, and since there's already a personality-rights tag on the file, and The Photographer has said he knows the people identifiably depicted, I have no objections. Daniel Case (talk) 00:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Daniel. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Btw, Find the user Beria in the picture :) --The Photographer 16:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- @The Photographer: Are you sure that user wants to be outed/revealed in this way?? --cart-Talk 21:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
@W.carter:A.Savin When you are taking pictures of architectural wonders or beautiful landscapes it's very easy to get a wow effect and finally a FP. I think that those architectural wonders are always there wainting for be shooted because they can be photographed by anyone in any time and the change on this building or landspace is minimal in decades and just the next year someone will make a better picture because this type of photography has more to do with the camera power camera than the photographer himself. Turning ordinary things into wonderful is what makes a good photographer, however, it is more difficult to impact when you take pictures of common things but of fleeting moments that will not come back again. In this particular case, it is a photograph that is the result of the 3 year work (It seems unbelievable but it is true). Each day I was going to take the same picture, taking care of the details and looking for a way to make it better the next day. Taking a picture inside a moving car is a very difficult task especially because there is little lighting, people are in constant motion (especially in the most densely traveled metro in the world sao paulo) and a great depth of field is necessary. This photo is not particularly great and a photo should not be explained to be FP, however, I think that in this section, in the evaluation process, we are basing ourselves only on visual aspects without taking into account some particularities. My comment is more general and not specifically about this image that I'm honestly not sure I can or can not be FP.--The Photographer 15:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)- @The Photographer: I think you misunderstood me very much!! I was not criticizing your photo at all, I was only concerned that you had revealed the name of a Commons user and in a way told everyone that it was a person in this photo. I was thinking about that user's right to have their Commons name protected. That has nothing to do with the quality of your photo, which is actually very good under such difficult circumstances. --cart-Talk 15:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment There are several possibilities to photograph a metro train interior: you can wait till the train has stopped (to avoid camera shake), you can make the photo at late hour (so that it's not much crowded). Yes it's more difficult than a building at sunny day, but still not particularly challenging to say "wow" just because of technically good shot. For those, there is COM:QIC. --A.Savin 05:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry I was answering it to A.Savin --The Photographer 17:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Having met Beria I will say she's very, uh, outgoing anyway and probably wouldn't mind (but all the same, even though I'm pretty sure which person in the photo is her, I will not say so publicly). Daniel Case (talk) 16:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Btw, Find the user Beria in the picture :) --The Photographer 16:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:29, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Too ordinary, no wow as others already mentioned. -- Pofka (talk) 13:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support Convinced by The Photographer's explanation. Good educational value. I think this is harder than it looks, and I certainly don't feel brave enough to point my DSLR down the tube carriage. -- We currently have a campaign of posters asking the public to report anyone doing dodgy things like taking photos on the underground. -- Colin (talk) 12:35, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Colin: That's an interesting picture. It shows someone who is taking photo of a CCTV camera in London Underground (?) and they advise to report this person to police, if I understand correctly. Well, maybe they should switch on Common Sense first, and the Golden Rule here is the following: Anything that is accessible and visible to public is meaningless to prohibit to take pictures of. It adds nothing to safety, national security, counnter-terrorism etc. pp., it's just -- one freedom less, period. For this reason, photographing in public transport remains prohibited in countries like Uzbekistan (dictatorship). Very sad that they in England are still thinking like barbarians from dictatorships. Just a side note. --A.Savin 18:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow. --Gnosis (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)