Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mengerschwamm without main light light strength 0,65 8K.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mengerschwamm without main light light strength 0,65 8K.png, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2019 at 09:46:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
Info A Menger sponge with a light source in its center, cursing shadows via raytracing techniques (ambient occlusion, more infos in the description), after correction suggestions by Wikimedia Commons users (Thanks for that). The PNG version was recommended, so that the lossless character is given, created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 09:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 09:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Oppose out of scope of Commons per COM:NOTUSED, there's no realistical use for an educational purpose detectable, this artwork is only uploaded to showcase the artist's skills or better: the CPU and GPU power of his computer.--Chianti (talk) 14:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Chianti: Since there is a whole category on Commons for these Menger sponges and articles about them in 29 languages, you can't possibly say this is out of scope. This is one of the more interesting versions of these images and it can surely be used somewhere. Please remember that Commons and FPC are not Wikipedia. Read the rules more carefully, especially #7: "7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project." --Cart (talk) 16:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support Definitely useful and valuable in illustrating the Menger sponge, and has wow for me. One that really needs to be viewed in full-res, as the thumbnail tends to make it look dark and undetailed. Cmao20 (talk) 16:17, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support but would prefer brighter whites and deeper blacks. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support --СССР (talk) 03:12, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Boothsift 06:19, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support No color is a color. This fractal would also display well as a pure, velvety monochrome. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulphere 08:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 15:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
