Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar Auferstehung 02.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar Auferstehung 02.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2018 at 08:07:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media#Religion
Info Resurrection of Christ at the winged altar of the parish- and pilgrimage church Maria Laach am Jauerling, Lower Austria. View for Sundays with closed inner wings. Anonymous master, 1480. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment Your earlier photos File:Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar Sonntagsseite 03.jpg (set) and File:Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar Auferstehung 01.jpg (this frame) are quite different in colour and lighting. Perhaps this time the light was shining differently? The set photo shows the colour temperature looked ok for that, yet this one is a lot cooler. The image is brighter with more contrast (particularly the gold in the sky is no longer golden). Is that from a lighting change, or a result of post-processing (e.g., Clarity slider maxed out)? There's a bit of reflecting shine on the right of the photo, which isn't in the older one, and suggests the light direction wasn't optimal here. If the painting is really dulled with age, then I think we should show that rather than try to clean it up in post, which is my concern here. For a set of paintings like this, I think the value would be increased if you could make a high quality set nomination. -- Colin (talk)
- @Colin: The older images are taken at pure natural light and a rather cheap consumer lens, while this time the altar piece was (unfortunately) illuminated by some spots and the image is taken with a professional lens. This makes the difference. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support Happy to support good art photos --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:13, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:28, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Moroder. Daniel Case (talk) 22:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Oppose sorry. I don't think the lighting on this is done well. The reflecting shine on the painting is not consistent with our best FP paintings. Also not convinced about the explanation for radical colour and contrast change -- a different lens would not make difference to anything other than sharpness. I think the sky should be gold, but the lighting angle / processing has caused it to be too bright. -- Colin (talk) 08:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media#Religion
