Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Makadi Spa Hurghada.jpg

File:Makadi Spa Hurghada.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2021 at 11:21:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Makadi Spa Hurghada.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Makadi Spa Hurghada.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
•  Info created by jonie148 - uploaded by jonie148 - nominated by jonie148 -- Jonie148 (talk) 11:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jonie148 (talk) 11:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice, but it would unlikely pass the quality image review. It's noisy and lacks sharpness. --A.Savin 12:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose Very nice idea for an eye-catcher. But unfortunately the qualitative defects are outweighing. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
• Mild  Support: You guys really think this would fail CR in QIC? Granted, it looks oversharpened on my 23.5-inch monitor, but it looks good and maybe just a tad overexposed on my 13-inch monitor, and moreover, it's beautiful and striking. I dissent from you guys' opinion about this. I guess I'm not totally sure it should be featured, but I think pixel-peeping to this extent on such a big monitor might not be the best yardstick - it's impressive when photos look totally great at that size, but we've featured plenty of photos that are a little fuzzy or noisy when they're blown up that big. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Dear Ikan, thank you for reminding the rule to prefer the wow effect over the technical quality for the FP program. And this image has a wow. I reviewed the photo in Photoshop with 100% view on a 23 inch monitor. Maybe my decision was too strict, but I missed the fine image details in this view. I will reconsider my voting. Many regards. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Info I carefully reviewed the photo again. It is IMHO really a good composition except the missing fine image details and the crooked upper and right line of the window niche. I want to keep my current evaluation. Many regards. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose, noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)