Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maison à Castel Meur - Pointe du Château.jpg

File:Maison à Castel Meur - Pointe du Château.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 15 May 2009 at 19:46:39

•  Info created by Rectilinium - uploaded by Rectilinium - nominated by Rectilinium -- Rectilinium (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Rectilinium (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral Great composition & atmosphere, but unfortunately there are quality issues (artefacts, not too sharp) --ianaré (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
• Yes, agree with Ianare, interesting subject as well. However, people keep waving through images downsampled to 2MP which easily attain high apparent sharpness. This seems unfair to say the least. I'll go with a  Support here. --Dschwen (talk) 22:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Thou I would prefer tighter crop. I agree with Dschwen. —kallerna™ 14:12, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support as above --Muhammad (talk) 14:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral I can't shake the feeling that there's a slight CCW tilt. Whether it's actually there or just an illusion, it's distracting to me. —Notyourbroom (talk) 17:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral For your information, this house in Brittany is famous too because the owner sued for "image rights", which set a legal precedent. Now, commercial use of images of this home is forbidden. A reference, but in French: [1]. --Myrabella (talk) 00:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose If commercial use is forbidden (see above) then sadly this image has no place on Commons. Lycaon (talk) 22:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Thats why I published it under the GFDL 1.2only-Licence. And there are already other pictures of this house on WP. For example: File:Pointe du Château 09652.jpg, File:Pointe du Château 09655.jpg, File:Das Haus zwischen den Felsen.jpg. On the french WP there is an article about Plougrescant, where the information (that a commercial use of pictures of that house is forbidden) is mentioned. Nevertheless, there is a picture of the house. See here: [2] --Rectilinium (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  • The house is 148 years old. What possible copyright concerns could there be? And those are the main concerns inportant to us at commons. --Dschwen (talk) 19:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose License is not compatible with subject matter. The very first line of the license states "The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other functional and useful document 'free' in the sense of freedom: to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially." It may be used on wikipedia, which is non-commercial, but I couldn't print this image and sell it as with other images here. --ianaré (talk) 20:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I wonder if the owner can legally claim "image rights" or prevent (commercial) publication. Especially on images like this one, where the house is not the main subject, but only a small part of the landscape. I fully agree that the owner does not want tourists photographing in his garden or on top of the rocks. But this is not the case here: apparently this image was taken from the public space. -- MJJR (talk) 19:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think there is any legal issue, but the image is tilted. See the shore. Yann (talk) 21:00, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 22:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)