Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Madis Eek.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Madis Eek.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2012 at 09:50:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Meeli Küttim - uploaded by Kruusamägi - nominated by WikedKentaur -- WikedKentaur (talk) 09:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- WikedKentaur (talk) 09:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Neutral -- I like where the man is sitting with his dog. Nice composition. TrebleSeven (talk) 11:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose -- I see nothing extaordinary justifying the FP status either in the subject or in the image. A fine snapshot but no more than that imo. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 12:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support The photo has a nice composition and a man enjoying a laptop. --Katarighe (talk) 21:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Question What is valuable to use dog in the illustration of Madis Eek? Przykuta → [edit] 10:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support superb – excellent composition and light --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- OpposeDust spots and as Alvesgaspar--Miguel Bugallo 21:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC) The uppon part of the leaves is too blue. Why?--Miguel Bugallo 21:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment It seems like this picture has some licence issue.Trongphu (talk) 00:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I think there is some wow factor. The image is quite interesting. But for FP, I think there are some problems: dust spots (many), tilt (minor problem here), licensing, blown parts in the sky...--Paolo Costa (talk) 03:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose - wait for OTRS confirmation of license, please. --Claritas (talk) 09:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose the best is the dog's head, IMO. Tilt, License problem, notability issue in enWP (ok, does not concern 'Commons'), colors problems, dust spots. And above all, nothing 'magic' (wow effect). Nice advertising for Apple anyway, and not politically correct because of the smocking man !--Jebulon (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose -- I'm sorry, but I really don't see anything remarkable. Apart from the dog's rather weird collar. MartinD (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose, I do not understand the value of photography. --Sasha Krotov (talk) 11:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose funny picture --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)