Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MD BOUALAM.South Mediterranean El-maghreb 16.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:MD BOUALAM.South Mediterranean El-maghreb 16.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2017 at 11:38:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
- Info 50px|link=User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2/Nomination of featured images on Arabic Wikipedia Project Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created and uploaded by محمد بوعلام عصامي - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I'm assuming this is a long-exposure photograph. If so, I'm willing to forgive some sharpness issues. Even then, when viewed at 100%, the quality of the image is great for a >5000px length long-exposure image. It's a nice view with a very useful insight to the flow of water on this rock shelf – one of the many benefits of long-exposure photography of water. Philip Terry Graham (talk) 11:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately, the people were moving. Charles (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support The moving people, and their motion, are a very small part of this image. Daniel Case (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support per others, as it's quite interesting. The exposure time is shown as 10 seconds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 18:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry, but lack of sharpness (diffraction with f/22) is too much for me. --Ivar (talk) 19:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose with stack technics we could have the sharpness in the rock and people, and still having the smooth water, that is not that smooth, especially in the bottom. I know that we should encourage photos of this rare location for us, however should be better for FP. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 01:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Long-exposure waves are inherently beautiful; I don't see anything in this composition that sets it apart. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)