Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, LVM, -Villa Kunterbunt- -- 2013 -- 1-2.jpg

File:Münster, LVM, -Villa Kunterbunt- -- 2013 -- 1-2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2013 at 16:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, LVM, -Villa Kunterbunt- -- 2013 -- 1-2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, LVM, -Villa Kunterbunt- -- 2013 -- 1-2.jpg

•  Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 16:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 16:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment WB is somewhat blue IMO, otherwise very good. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Certainly the top heavy perspective is not in accordance with the usual standards here. 131.137.245.207 17:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support An excellent example for the usage of HDRI technique - well done. @IP: If you are very close the a building it is normal that the close parts seem to be much larger than the farer parts - I cannot see why this is "not in accordance with the usual standards". I really like the level of detail in lights and shadows and the colorful lights. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support イントレピッドサンダー (talk) 19:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Info --I understand it's the blue hour but here it was really too much, and over-saturated in that color. I uploaded a color balanced version, bringing back colors in the tainted windows and in the street. Sting (talk) 00:15, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

  Better now,  Support. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

•  InfoThanks for adjusting the colors. I'll adjust the colors at the origin too. So the adjustment take effect if a new version of the image will be uploaded - if neccessary.--XRay ^talk 17:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition and color management. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:24, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 13:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 16:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:55, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 08:33, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe a little CA on the top edge, but not enough to offset everything that makes this photo stand out as you're scrolling down the page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^diskuse 09:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose simply too oversaturated for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Dey.sandip (talk) 12:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose color management overprocessed --Vamps (talk) 17:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 23:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --.InfiniteHiveMind. (talk) 19:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /JKadavoor Jee 06:15, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture