Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, LBS -- 2021 -- 9804.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Münster, LBS -- 2021 -- 9804.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2021 at 09:22:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Office building of the LBS in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Sorry, I can't follow your arguments. Why do you think, parts of buildings are not object for FP? That should only be your opinion, but by no means a set of rules. There are much examples für very good photographs with building parts. And there is no rule for different images (it's not similar) of the same object. I would like to ask you to read the rules for a nomination here again carefully. (And: And please explain your reasons for a contra. "I don't like it" (your statement in abbreviated form) is not a good and helpful reason.) --XRay 💬 05:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I never told, that parts of buildings are not object for FP is rule for everybody. But this is what I think and what I feel and I shall decide next time by the same principle. Off course, it could be some exceptions, but this is not that case here. I add my vote as a person (human beeing), not like some robot. So it is also answer for that claim "I don't like it" is good enough for anybodies decision, when voting.
  • And there is also some other problem here. I believe, that anybody, who edits this page more frequently could after some time see, that there is something like private club of aproximately 30 - 50 wikipedians, who are supporting each other. Working by system: Now I will support you, next time you will help me. One can see, that images from some authors are supported very quickly and easy by some members of this "club" (not by all of them, off course) and images of new comming authors have much more problems to be voted. -- Karelj (talk) 13:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your words may already reveal the dilemma. The impression of a "club" might be wrong, unfortunately there are not that many active people here, so that the impression could arise. They're not Wikipedians either, because we're here at Wikimedia Commons. The demands on images are different at Wikipedia. Wikimedia Commons is a media archive with many possibilities, whereby the media can also be used for Wikipedia. New nominations sometimes have difficulties at the beginning because the procedure is not fully understood. But that will subside over time. All of us sometimes have pictures that are rejected. And from my point of view: Why should I add a contradicting voice if there are already enough voices? No vote or a neutral vote may be an alternative. --XRay 💬 06:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 13:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Münster,_LBS_--_2021_--_9804.jpg&oldid=576680047"