Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Dom -- 2017 -- 2092.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Münster, Dom -- 2017 -- 2092.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 04:49:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 04:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Support -- XRay talk 04:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Only part of building visible, overall chaotic impression for me.--Karelj (talk) 09:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)- Oppose the composition/crop is too tight imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support This is an outstanding and very interesting perspective on the cathedral with many details. I think only the Überwasserkirche in the background is a bit disturbing, but it doesn´t really matter. --Milseburg (talk) 18:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Milesburg. HalfGig talk 00:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Thennicke (talk) 11:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Might well be a VI for the way it captures the church in its urban context. But I don't see an FP here as the Uberwasskirche scaffolding is distracting ... one unfamiliar with Münster (i.e., myself) could easily think the other building's tower to be part of the church too. Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Martin Falbisoner. Sorry. --Nikhil B (talk) 04:51, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- weak support Kind of blurry in the background, but may be caused by my computer. --It's Kong of Lazers 你好 00:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Kong of Lasers: Please do not use these templates, as the bot doesn't recognize them. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Yann I'm sorry, I saw somebody else use it. --It's Kong of Lazers 你好 22:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Kong of Lasers: But you can use {{support|weak support}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Yann: Thanks!!!--It's Kong of Lazers 你好 22:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Kong of Lasers: But you can use {{support|weak support}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Yann I'm sorry, I saw somebody else use it. --It's Kong of Lazers 你好 22:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Kong of Lasers: Please do not use these templates, as the bot doesn't recognize them. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
