Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LuxuriesVersusLifeboatsPuckMagazine1912.jpg

File:LuxuriesVersusLifeboatsPuckMagazine1912.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2022 at 23:54:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:LuxuriesVersusLifeboatsPuckMagazine1912.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LuxuriesVersusLifeboatsPuckMagazine1912.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Magazine_and_newspaper_illustrations_in_color
•  Info created by Puck [Udo Keppler] - uploaded by PDMagazineCoverUploading [cropped; original uploaded by Fæ in 2018] - nominated by PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 23:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Info Cropped slightly to eliminate the image background.
•  Support -- Despite the crease down the middle, I think this is artistically and historically evocative enough to warrant FP status. It certainly immediately jumped out at me when I was going through Keppler's cartoons! Will support delisting & replacing if someone can get rid of the crease without compromising the rest of the image. PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 23:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support per PDMagazineCoverUploading. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 03:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good reproduction of an impressive illustration with historical value. I remember this image being used in one of my schoolbooks as an illustration of contemporary reactions on the sinking of RMS Titanic; and it is indeed indicative and revealing. --Aristeas (talk) 06:30, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support partially as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good and interesting. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --IamMM (talk) 11:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment You mention a crease but not the tears that result in loss. I want to see a digital restoration of this great print. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:12, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: While I'd be willing to, I'd like to see it in use on at least one article first. I don't tend to do lengthy restorations that aren't going to be used. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

• Understood. It's a lot of work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Well, IMHO this print would fit very well into the article about the sinking of RMS Titanic, either in the Aftermath section or into the cultural legacy section. The same applies to non-English Wikipedia articles about the ship, given that they have reached a certain length and include aftermath/legacy/reception sections. --Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek and Aristeas: Certainly agree it can fit, but I do like to give things like this a little time to settle into articles before restoring them. If it lands in a couple and sticks, nothing stopping - presuming PDMagazineCoverUploading doesn't mind - a delist and replace. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support -sasha- (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Printed#Magazine_and_newspaper_illustrations_in_color