Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lunch dish (pumpkin sauce, potatoes and chicken steak).jpg

File:Lunch dish (pumpkin sauce, potatoes and chicken steak).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2017 at 15:23:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lunch dish (pumpkin sauce, potatoes and chicken steak).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lunch dish (pumpkin sauce, potatoes and chicken steak).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
•  Info Lunch dish (pumpkin sauce, potatoes and chicken steak). My shot. --Mile (talk) 15:23, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 15:23, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment A bit too much blue in the white balance, it makes the dish look less tasty. It also seems you have two conflicting light sources in the photo, so not so easy to correct. Otherwise sharp and nice. --cart-Talk 19:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Atsme 📞 01:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - I wouldn't have been able to isolate the details that cart lays out, but I agree that the picture should be improvable. Please ping me if you try an update. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose WB is too blue and too green. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:14, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
• Ikan Kekek, cart: i wasnt happy about that blue neither, so i change now. I think its much better. King of new spot. --Mile (talk) 05:51, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks, Mile. I agree that the food looks much better; however, the side effect is that the plate has nearly disappeared. Would you consider just slightly increasing the contrast between the visible portions of the plate and the food? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Ikan Kekek now is more visible, but count on it, while on white surface, to be less visible (dishes,cups etc). So you focus to food...food foto is a bit different than panoramas. --Mile (talk) 10:39, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Hmmm... Not convinced yet. Please see this example of how you can get the plate and the food equally visible on a white background. --cart-Talk 10:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - I've actually looked at a lot of food photographs and even took some of my own (nowhere near featurable quality). I was a sysop for a food discussion board at one time. The food looks good in this photo, and the plate is slightly more visible but still blends into the background at full size. I will live with it longer and see if I can come to a decision on whether to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

• Will try next time. --Mile (talk) 15:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

• A good rule of thumb is: "You don't eat the food you photograph and you don't photograph the food you eat." --cart-Talk 17:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose I'm not convinced by the lighting. Somehow both the food and the plate look pale and grey in front of that much brighter background. By the way, something in that image makes my brain believe that the plate is angled in a way that should make the food slide off it towards the bottom left corner. I'm really puzzled, can anyone explain that? --El Grafo (talk) 12:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 08:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /cart-Talk 10:12, 21 June 2017 (UTC)