Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Libélula (Tramea sp), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 145.jpg

File:Libélula (Tramea sp), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 145.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2017 at 21:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Libélula (Tramea sp), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 145.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Libélula (Tramea sp), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 145.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
•  Info Exemplar of a Saddlebags glider (Tramea sp.), Cerro Brujo, San Cristobal Island, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador. All by me, Poco² 21:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 21:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The wings get lost in the bokeh. Daphne Lantier 22:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daphne Lantier makes a good point but I think everything else in the photo is so good it should be voted FP despite the small shortcoming.--Peulle (talk) 22:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support To me the bokeh fade makes the wings look more dreamlike. Daniel Case (talk) 01:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support The colors! The Bokeh! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 02:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Focus is better on the early nom which just failed for one vote. I'll support it again. Jee 03:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

• Hmmm, after comparing both images several times I decided to  Support this though the end segment (S10) is out of focus which is very important in identification purposes. As KoH and Cart commented the light is far better here. The other one seems in backlit. Jee 14:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Beautiful creamy bokeh. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support The focus may not be 100%, but the light and colors are irresistable. The bokeh does interfere a bit with the wings, but combined with this posture, the now gossamer wings makes this a fairytale photo. --cart-Talk 12:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Again, exactly what I was thinking, just stated more clearly. Daniel Case (talk) 17:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose As Jee says, the end of the abdomen is out of focus. The other image was better quality. Charles (talk) 19:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Plus, plus, plus - great shot with excellent detail where it counts. Atsme 📞 03:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The bright background is too distracting for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I think the loveliness of the composition and bokeh make up for the slight unsharpness -- Thennicke (talk) 09:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Daphne Lantier. Wings looks problematic to me as well. -- Pofka (talk) 08:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose We've seen lots excellent images of dragonflies at FPC in the past. While this one certainly is not a bad image, I think it's not quite up the the competition. --El Grafo (talk) 11:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Daphne Lantier 06:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)