Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Large Gautama Buddha statue in Buddha Park of Ravangla, Sikkim.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Large Gautama Buddha statue in Buddha Park of Ravangla, Sikkim.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2018 at 17:27:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
- Info created by Subhrajyoti07 - uploaded by Subhrajyoti07 - nominated by Subhrajyoti07 -- Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice but looking at the unprocessed image you posted in the history it appears the chest is more exposed than it should be (lost detail) and the forest shouldn't have this blueish tone.
--Trougnouf (talk) 17:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The brightness of the statue has been increased by adding some localized adjustments. But as per histogram there are no over blown highlights. It is slightly on the bright side but with details intact. The slight bluish in forest I guess was a result of decreasing the global contrast in the image. - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose as previous comments Charles (talk) 20:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
OpposeAn impressive photo, but unfortunately you have emphasized the blue colours --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)- Comment The blue colour has been dialed down a bit globally in the photo. Pl check - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support After improvement --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support good enough now, imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Looks good, but there's a strange loss of fine detail (visible in the grass and bushes at the bottom). Too much noise reduction? dllu (t,c) 06:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - This is a really imposing image. I'll await your work to address dllu's points before I vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - I re-processed the image from scratch this time with selective noise reduction and aimed at maintaining the overall incremental improvement on this image that I have been doing basis feedback from various reviewers over the last few weeks. I think I have been able to address the issue highlighted by dllu in the latest version. The updated image has already been uploaded. - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 17:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support chest detail is visible to the naked eye, less blue and less exaggerated colors, I approve. --Trougnouf (talk) 18:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support Interesting subject, quite good for me. Yann (talk) 11:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Question statue appears to be leaning roughly 0.5° (counterclockwise from viewer's position)... does that reflect reality? Storkk (talk) 18:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - The observation on tilt is correct (It was off by 0.53 deg). I have fixed it now and uploaded the updated photo. Thanks - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 02:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support seems fine now. dllu (t,c) 18:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support Poco2 19:42, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- WQL (talk) 05:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 23:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects