Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Landsort August 2016 32.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Landsort August 2016 32.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2017 at 05:34:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created & uploaded by User:ArildV - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Support - This is a very different view of Landsort than we've featured before: a peaceful view at nightfall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)- Support a tighter bottom crop could further improve the image --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Not that much to see here, really, to me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Question - So this photo is not busy enough for you? :-) There doesn't seem to be much interest. But the voting period lasts 8 more days, so I will wait a bit longer before considering a withdrawal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment - I don't really understand the lack of interest, pro or con, in this image. Do you all just find it too subtle to interest you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- For me, it's just such a routine seascape that wearily checks all the boxes: ultrawide lens, blue hour, rocky foreground, smooth water, horizon right in the middle. It's been done so many times before. The soft light and wispy clouds are nice, so I don't feel strongly enough to oppose, but I'd really want to see something a little more unique. There's so much potential in this scene, with the low moon and interesting rock formations, that in context the nominated image seems to lack the all-important wow factor. FWIW, I'd gladly support File:Landsort August 2016 14.jpg, another photo in the series that is much more compelling IMO. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:23, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing this.
I withdraw my nomination -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing this.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 02:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
