Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Landscape of science fiction Luc Viatour.jpg

File:Landscape of science fiction Luc Viatour.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2009 at 09:43:44

•  Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 09:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 09:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX^talk  11:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Impressive picture. Can you give some info about how you made the picture? --AngMoKio (talk) 12:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

(sorry for answer in french) C'est deux photographies faites au Nikon D300 le même jour. Une avec 45mm de focale pour les nuages et une avec 1000mm de focale pour la Lune, les deux sont assemblées avec le logiciel GIMP et transformées en noir et blanc. --Luc Viatour (talk) 12:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC) •  Translation: Those are two photographs I took the same day with the Nikon D300. One for the clouds with a 45mm focal length, and another one for the Moon with a 1,000mm focal length, the two photos being merged with GIMP and transformed into black and white. →Diti the penguin — 16:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Very noisy, can't understand french. —kallerna™ 14:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment very impressive work. But before I support you should add the retouched template to the description of the picture --Simonizer (talk) 15:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting post processing.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support →Diti the penguin — 16:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support merci beaucoup pour les informations :-) --AngMoKio (talk) 16:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Great work! Tiago Fioreze (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --staka.^talk 03:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Dcubillas (talk) 05:44, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support We're probably going to see lots of these images now ;) --Muhammad 06:27, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy and I don't see the value of this 'personal artwork' for any Wikimedia project. Lycaon (talk) 09:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I oppose since it's a composition that is done for achieving an artistical purpose. As said in the guidelines: Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in a photographic image is generally acceptable provide it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive. Typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and colour/exposure correction. ... Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. Therefore I am against the nomination. But the picture is still amazing. --Henrik (talk) 14:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose As per the pertinent photography magazines, science fiction mashup's are the big trend for 2009. It's nice and would suit for Flickr .. but per Lycaon. --Richard Bartz (talk) 03:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose What Henrik said. Samulili (talk) 20:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral it is a good work, which can find its use in project. Lyacom forget, that there is not just Wikipedie. But I agree with him, that is noisy.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 09:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lycaon, but it's a really beautiful picture --Pom² (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Jon Harald Søby (talk) 17:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Beautiful composition but poor image quality -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

result: 11 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. --Karel (talk) 09:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)