Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lama glama Laguna Colorada 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Lama glama Laguna Colorada 2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2019 at 18:41:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
Info created - uploaded by Kallerna - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Centered composition (more space on the left needed) and the dark shadows interfere with the subjects. – Lucas 20:30, 5 May 2019 (UTC)- Weak support for pure cuteness factor, whilst taking Lucas' criticisms into account. Cmao20 (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Lucas--BoothSift 23:06, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support - None of the stuff Lucas objects to bothers me. The only fault I find with the form is that the llama excrement that seems to be on the right side might have been excluded if perhaps the photo were taken when the llamas were a little further to the left. Otherwise, I would observe that the photo is just a bit grainy/noisy, but only at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support Great photo. Yann (talk) 04:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 06:14, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:00, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 08:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support Had the big Lama been alone in the shot, I would have agreed with Lucas' call for more lead room. But as my mind kind of sees the Lama train as one entity, the smaller one balances that nicely. It's slightly back-focused, but that's countered by plenty of WOW. --El Grafo (talk) 10:05, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of detail on animal faces or eyes --Cvmontuy (talk) 17:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- 🇪A〒ℂ🇭A 💬 20:02, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support for the reasons mentioned above --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:02, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support As mentioned above this image is back-focused, but the Llamas' woollen fleece is still just in focus. I see an idealised dropping line from the mother Llama's ear tufts to the cute youngster's stubby tail and beyond. True, it doesn't sync with the pile of droppings, but who cares. That's nature. From first sight this photograph conveyed to me a fair image of the stark Bolivian landscape, and that first emotion counts. Franz van Duns (talk) 23:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Neutral I don't care that much about the center composition like I do for the lack of the head details of the first animal as per Cvmontuy. Not sure. -- Jakub Fryš (talk) 04:26, 14 May 2019 (UTC)- Support. Vulphere 14:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
