Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kuwait Towers RB.jpg

[[:]], featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2014 at 14:28:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/ Commons:Featured picture candidates/

•  Info Kuwait Towers Kuwait City, Kuwait c/u/n by   • Richard • [®] • 14:28, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --   • Richard • [®] • 14:28, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
• as written on QIC: remarkable sensor dust. Try the new LR 5 function "Bereiche anzeigen". The larger the sensor the more sensor dust :) --Tuxyso (talk) 14:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Fixed.   • Richard • [®] • 14:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support I am personally not a big fan of that kind of neutral light, but composition, level of detail and motive are convincing enough for me. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support per Tuxyso. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 15:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Might have preferred a different arrangement of the three, and a more interesting foreground (could you clone out the can of 7-up?) but good detail and strange buildings. -- Colin (talk) 15:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition. Removing the can is a good idea. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support per Tuxyso. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Question Does anyone know if there is Freedom of Panorama in Kuwait? On COM:FOP there is no info on this country, but most Arabic countries have restrictive copyright law (compare: UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc.). This here is modern architecture obviously passing any originality test. I really wish my worries were unsubstantial, as it's a fine image otherwise. --A.Savin 19:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

I haven't found any informations as well.   • Richard • [®] • 20:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

This was my concern in QIC too, and I did not find any answer neither.--Jebulon (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

• We have to live with an gray area for now - but - I'll gather an location release for this image when i'am back in germany. I have to do this quite often when I work for clients.   • Richard • [®] • 06:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Although I fear it will unfortunately ended up deleted due to non-FOP Poco² 11:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral Would support pending a determination on FoP. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kasir (talk) 12:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Daniel Case.--Jebulon (talk) 23:58, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support No need to waste our time for FoP matters. It will be deleted form our FP galleries too; if deleted from Commons. A good work (by the architect and Richard). Jee 03:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support ArionEstar (talk) 21:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /ArionEstar (talk) 17:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers