Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Komatsu bulldozer pushing coal in Power plant Ljubljana (winter 2017).jpg

File:Komatsu bulldozer pushing coal in Power plant Ljubljana (winter 2017).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2017 at 07:44:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Komatsu bulldozer pushing coal in Power plant Ljubljana (winter 2017).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Komatsu bulldozer pushing coal in Power plant Ljubljana (winter 2017).jpg

2415

1513

1576

619

4296

2352

Indonesian coal

2281

643

706

737

4296

2352

Semi-U tilt dozer; up to 7 m³

4163

196

118

172

4296

2352

part of high buidling

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles
•  Info Komatsu bulldozer pushing coal in Power plant Ljubljana (winter 2017). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 07:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 07:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Just like Kabellerger's shot of the train going across the bridge, the color pops against the natural winter monochrome behind it. Daniel Case (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 21:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image is good, but I feel uneasy looking at it because you seem to have rotated it to make the bottoms of the tracks horizontal - really, what needs to be horizontal is the bucket, because that is what is in the center of the image - and at the moment the bucket is tilted heavily to the left. Which would be fine if the dozer was going uphill, but the composition does not contain clues to that, and therefore this is uneasy on my eyes. I also think this is slightly overprocessed - too much contrast. Good, simple composition though, and Daniel's comment about the colours is spot on. I'll definitely support if you fix the problems I've noted -- Thennicke (talk) 10:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

• Thennicke Good, first, i couldnt say is bulldozer in normal position by nothing here seeing vehicle alone, but look i have some luck. See note, there is part of high building on right side, you can see vertical line is positioned good. This was one of quick images, nothing much to change, contrast same, but offset changed to my taste to -0.0124. Offset and crop. So, no rotating, this path goes some 10-12 % uphill. --Mile (talk) 12:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

• Yes, now that you point it out I see it. However, a person looking at the thumbnail will not notice it, so that isn't good. And for that reason, I stand by my statements. -- Thennicke (talk) 13:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support. No problem with the angles for me, and the distant buildings on the right confirm that no rotating has taken place. —Bruce1ee^talk 17:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I like the contrast between the yellow dozer, the black coal and the white snow. Nice and creative idea. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 03:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - There is a lot of energy in the picture. Nice composition and I am not worried about the angles. --Pugilist (talk) 07:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Reguyla (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 02:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 22:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles