Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kodak BW 2015-02-18 20-07-15.jpg

File:Kodak BW 2015-02-18 20-07-15.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2015 at 15:00:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kodak BW 2015-02-18 20-07-15.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kodak BW 2015-02-18 20-07-15.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The shadow goes inwards (bad positioned ligth ?), also camera could be tunred little bit to recth, to see front plane better. --Mile (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Kodak of 1902.....good quality....for me is good. The shadow is not disturb for me --LivioAndronico talk 19:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support the Shadow is ok. Maybe, right a bit crop? And a little bit more light? But its good for FP to me. --Ralf Roleček 21:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm missing an extra main front light, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 11:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment [Edit conflict: per Kadellar, pretty much] I really think the front could be a little brighter, this should be relatively simple to correct. It's your choice of course. — Julian H.^✈ 11:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose as a consequence. — Julian H.^✈ 06:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Front is too dark for me. Supporting surface could be better cleaned. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 12:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 19:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose lightning issues. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others, lighting arrangement leaves room for improvement. Also, standing on the edge like that, the camera somehow seems to defy gravity – maybe a plain white background without shadows would've worked better in this case? --El Grafo (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)