Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kloster Banz Luftbild-20220921-RM-122046.jpg

File:Kloster Banz Luftbild-20220921-RM-122046.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2023 at 14:13:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kloster Banz Luftbild-20220921-RM-122046.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kloster Banz Luftbild-20220921-RM-122046.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
•  Info Aerial view of Banz Monastery in the district of Lichtenfels. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 14:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 14:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive capture. One of my favorites among the German WLM winners. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The dramatic wall of clouds provides an impressive background for the sunlit monastery. --Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --BigDom (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:19, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful, though not very big. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Beautiful clouds and colors. With less than perfect sharpness at 5 MP, it's not an ideal amount of true resolution, but just meets the minimum standard for a drone photo in 2022. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Neutral everything is very good, except the resolution. -- Ivar (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Iifar, I don't understand why the resolution had to be that low. --A.Savin 20:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
  •  Info@A.Savin: I had to crop the image.--Ermell (talk) 22:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
    • Just fly the drone closer. --A.Savin 00:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

      the composition would not be the same... cropping is equivalent to using a longer focal, and that is not necessarily avail on accessible to mortals drones. Also, it might be prohibited to get close to some buildings, depending on local regulations of course. - Benh (talk) 09:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

      The composition would not be equivalent, yet not necessarily worse IMO. --A.Savin 11:53, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

      Around that monastery there are nature protection areas (in which the use of drones is not allowed). When we discussed this photo in the German WLM jury, we checked that this photo has been taken from a point which is allowed. But Ermell had certainly not much freedom in positioning the drone here. --Aristeas (talk) 12:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

      There are so many points in Germany where, in theory, drones are not allowed... That is, actually nearly everywhere is off-limit for you, if you have only the "Kleiner Drohnenführerschein" (and the uttermost of us will have only this, if anything). According to coordinates, the drone was nearly above residential buildings or private properties, this is (in theory) prohibited as well. --A.Savin 12:56, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --XRay 💬 10:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Not huge size but gorgeous composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The German tourism ministry should use this image as a badly-needed alternative to that angle on Neuschwanstein that is probably the most frequently taken photograph in the country. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 09:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 04:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany