Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kits-Beach-Vancouver.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kits-Beach-Vancouver.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2017 at 01:20:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created by Xicotencatl - uploaded by Xicotencatl - nominated by Xicotencatl -- Xicotencatl (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Xicotencatl (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment - Please remove the dark spot above the evergreen on the right side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Done Thanks for noticing that! --Xicotencatl (talk) 05:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sure thing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Neutral Cool idea but there's very little detail in the city part of the image - looks completely washed out. -- KennyOMG (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)- Neutral Per Kenny. That the problem with high contrast here. Maybe there could have been a bit less of the green frame, too. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - If I had to choose between supporting or opposing, I'd oppose. And it's not because of anything you did. I love the compositional idea you had, and it's very well executed. OK, maybe the view of the city itself is a bit bright, but that's not my real problem with it; rather, it's that the small opening in the trees shows boring buildings. If the view had been more enchanting, or if this view had been enhanced with very unusual light and clouds or something, this could have been a contender. As it is, it's quite good, but not an FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Oppose I think the tree/view ratio is too low, and a crop would reveal too much the technical issues with the view (unsharpness, overexposure, posterization), I'd reshoot it with that in mind if you have access to the spot. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments, I cannot save this one. I may reshoot it in the future. --Xicotencatl (talk) 13:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
