Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kirchspiel, Visbeck (Skulptur nahe Marienkapelle) -- 2011 -- 2154.jpg

File:Kirchspiel, Visbeck (Skulptur nahe Marienkapelle) -- 2011 -- 2154.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2017 at 08:44:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kirchspiel, Visbeck (Skulptur nahe Marienkapelle) -- 2011 -- 2154.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kirchspiel, Visbeck (Skulptur nahe Marienkapelle) -- 2011 -- 2154.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
•  Info all by XRay -- XRay ^talk 08:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 08:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Striking and well lit. I don't love the background, but I think this is an FP, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support unusual and interesting --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 10:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Because of many CAs everywhere--Llez (talk) 12:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

• Sorry, but I can't find the CAs. But I tried to improve the image. Hopefully it's better now. --XRay ^talk 12:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Better now. I meant the red an green lines along the borders which look like CAs (I made an annotation of a the part of the picture, where you can (still) find them) --Llez (talk) 14:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you for your hint. The green CAs are fixed too. I haven't seen this and it was difficult because of the green background. --XRay ^talk 05:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose An interesting work, but the picture seems not to add anything to it that would make it wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 07:08, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose - The carving itself is great, but the photo is nothing exceptional. I'd expect the "eyes" to have the sharpest focus, but they're quite soft... and the rest of the image isn't particularly sharp, either. There's still noticeable CA, especially near the corners. With a straightforward shot in a controlled environment like this, I'd want to see extraordinary technical quality and it just isn't there, unfortunately. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 09:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)