Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kassel asv2022-02 img45 Wilhelmshöhe tram station.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Kassel asv2022-02 img45 Wilhelmshöhe tram station.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2022 at 11:49:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe tram station
  •  Weak oppose Nice and well-composed, but with the dull light, no more than a good QI for me. Looks a bit oversharpened when pixelpeeping. --Kreuzschnabel 06:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support even though I agree with the opposers' points, as I see this image as just managing to capture Germany in a single shot: the juxtaposition of the historic, ornate, sedately colored station with the bright, streamlined modern tram, against a background of the kind of dreary weather that prevails in Germany more often than not due to the climate. I am not betting on the image being promoted, but I still think I should cast this !vote. Daniel Case (talk) 18:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support Daniel has made a good point, and I would like to second the moral support. The overcast weather does not allow for a dramatic etc. impression, but because it avoids harsh shadows it gives you a very detailed impression. BTW: The photo is not oversharpened; it shows just the resolution you get from the sensor of the α7R II/III (which omits the usual anti-alias filter) and a good lens. You can tell the difference when looking at the details – here the sharpness impression comes from microcontrast, while oversharpening emphasizes the (macro-)contrast and can’t reconstruct the microcontrast. --Aristeas (talk) 14:29, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 06:50, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Neither the composition/subject, nor the ligthing nor the detail are extraordinary to me. I also find all those cables a minus, Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support per others. Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 23:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose per Kreuzschnabel and Poco..--GRDN711 (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]