Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kapelle Stadtfriedhof Göttingen 2017 03.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kapelle Stadtfriedhof Göttingen 2017 03.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2017 at 07:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info Chapel on the historic city cemetery in Göttingen, Germany. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 07:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support. — Julian H.✈ 07:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality of the image is great. The enveloping of the trees is what you have tried to compose but for some reason I feel that the right tree is blocking the building view and the picture does not seem to qualify for a FP candidate. Sorry!!! --Sanjay Acharya (talk) 19:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Sanjay ach: Thank you for the comment. I did get the alternative shot close enough to have that tree out of the way, but I prefer this because the chapel is standing among trees and to me, they are as much the subject as the building itself. I do understand your concern though. — Julian H.✈ 20:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- HalfGig talk 23:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - I prefer the alternative shot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I have added the alternative below. — Julian H.✈ 06:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Thennicke (talk) 04:13, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Up to thirds, all good. Wouldnt go alternative. --Mile (talk) 05:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition; excellent image -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:47, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this version of the motif because it highlights the character's park cemetery better.--Ermell (talk) 13:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose in favor of the alternative, which you might want to publicize by pinging everyone who's voted here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: The original has gained all support votes since the alternative was posted, so I guess it is the more popular choice. — Julian H.✈ 20:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Alternative Composition[edit]
- Info An unobstructed view from a position somewhat closer to the building. — Julian H.✈ 06:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I prefer this version, because the view of the chapel is essentially unobstructed and the trees delightfully embrace it on both sides. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
OpposeThe trees help to frame the building, an effect which is lost here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)- I don't get what you're seeing. They frame the building on each side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I like that in the first photo, the base of the trees slope up towards the base of the building, which is lacking in the second photo. But to be fair, I wouldn't have opposed this image if only this version were nominated, so striking my oppose. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- I think it's legitimate to oppose a featurable photo in favor of the version you prefer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Why? That would mean that two featureable versions could end up with 50 % opposes each, even though everyone agrees that they are both featurable. You should only oppose a candidate if you deem it not featurable. — Julian H.✈ 05:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- I think it's legitimate to oppose a featurable photo in favor of the version you prefer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- I like that in the first photo, the base of the trees slope up towards the base of the building, which is lacking in the second photo. But to be fair, I wouldn't have opposed this image if only this version were nominated, so striking my oppose. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- I don't get what you're seeing. They frame the building on each side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Of course, I think that everyone should be careful to avoid that situation and oppose an otherwise featurable photo only if it's clear that the result would be only to help the other version win. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support --fedaro (talk) 11:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
The chosen alternative is: File:Kapelle Stadtfriedhof Göttingen 2017 03.jpg