Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kampen, stadsbrug. 10-01-2022. (actm.) 02.jpg

File:Kampen, stadsbrug. 10-01-2022. (actm.) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2022 at 16:45:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kampen, stadsbrug. 10-01-2022. (actm.) 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kampen, stadsbrug. 10-01-2022. (actm.) 02.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands
•  Info Stadsbrug (Kampen) is a lifting bridge over the IJssel. (Lifting section).
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Normal image with nothing special --Wilfredor (talk) 19:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Nice structure and composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan --Kritzolina (talk) 20:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Lupe (talk) 21:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Something different whose charm is revealed in detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 23:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The golden wheels and the warm sunlight make the bridge look like a sculpture. --Aristeas (talk) 08:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Nice enough lighting and structure in preview, but comparably poor quality for current standards IMHO (noisy all over, much sharpening applied, bright parts look overexposed) at less than 10 MP. --Kreuzschnabel 09:38, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Wilfredor --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Reluctant weak oppose Interesting idea, but per Kreuz the technical problems are too much for an FP ... there's an awful lot of noise at the lower left. Support Better now. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Done.@Kreuzschnabel and Daniel Case: New upload. Noise locally reduced.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very good composition. But resolution and the resulting level of detail are borderline. Perhaps this was cropped a bit to much. --August Geyler (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Composition is everything here. I am not really seeing the technical problems to be honest, though. Cmao20 (talk) 11:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao20 --IamMM (talk) 05:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 14:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Like the image and agree with QI and VI ratings but IMO this bridge does not have enough wow for FP - sorry. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:28, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands